Gagging order
As of yesterday, the first rule of Newcastle Utd Football Club is don't talk about Newcastle Utd Football Club - at least, not if you're a player and have access to a Twitter account. While the new policy, borrowed wholesale from Taggart and Man Utd, isn't an outright ban (something the PFA would oppose), it does significantly curb freedom of expression - and, in one respect, extend the club's "no comment" stance beyond just the hierarchy.
Alan Pardew seemed resigned to the prospect of dressing-room disgruntlement at the decision but insisted it had to be taken: "They've probably seen it as another sort of dictatorial moment from us but we've had to issue them legally with a letter to say this is not right, it's a breach of contract and you have to understand you're going to be fined and disciplined for that. It can't happen."
Not being in the know I can't be sure, but presumably this could be rather problematic from a legal perspective - is forcing employees to sign up to new terms all perfectly above board?
Personally I can't claim to be disappointed by the decision. The restriction will presumably mean vulture-like journalists spend less time hungrily awaiting and then reporting on/blowing out of proportion juicy little titbits dropped by various regular tweeters (ASBO in particular), but will also give the likes of ourselves less insight into the behind-the-scenes workings of the club. However, that's a small price to pay if the leaky vessel is made watertight and any grievances and disputes are discussed and resolved in-house and in private as they should be, rather than played out on Twitter and then the back pages of the tabloids in full view of all.
Alan Pardew seemed resigned to the prospect of dressing-room disgruntlement at the decision but insisted it had to be taken: "They've probably seen it as another sort of dictatorial moment from us but we've had to issue them legally with a letter to say this is not right, it's a breach of contract and you have to understand you're going to be fined and disciplined for that. It can't happen."
Not being in the know I can't be sure, but presumably this could be rather problematic from a legal perspective - is forcing employees to sign up to new terms all perfectly above board?
Personally I can't claim to be disappointed by the decision. The restriction will presumably mean vulture-like journalists spend less time hungrily awaiting and then reporting on/blowing out of proportion juicy little titbits dropped by various regular tweeters (ASBO in particular), but will also give the likes of ourselves less insight into the behind-the-scenes workings of the club. However, that's a small price to pay if the leaky vessel is made watertight and any grievances and disputes are discussed and resolved in-house and in private as they should be, rather than played out on Twitter and then the back pages of the tabloids in full view of all.
Labels: twitter
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home